Papalocal Your local communities & everything app — businesses, deals, library, and more.

The Lost 116 Pages of the Book of Mormon: What Happened and Why It Matters

How a scribe's manuscript vanished in 1828 and reshaped early Mormon history.

By Garret Merkley · Explainer · Jun 2, 2026
Branched from Martin Harris's Enduring Journey: A Witness Reaffirmed
Quick take
  • Martin Harris, a wealthy farmer, borrowed the first 116 pages of Joseph Smith's Book of Mormon translation in 1828 and lost them—the manuscript was never recovered.
  • Smith believed the loss was divine punishment for Harris's doubt and greed, and he stopped translating for months.
  • The incident forced Smith to change his translation method and created a permanent gap in the text (the Book of Lehi was never retranslated).
  • It became a defining moment that tested early Mormon faith and shaped how the religion understood revelation and obedience.

In the spring of 1828, Martin Harris, a New York farmer and early believer in Joseph Smith's prophetic mission, borrowed a stack of handwritten pages—116 pages of what would become the Book of Mormon. Harris wanted to show them to his wife Lucy to convince her of the work's authenticity. He never returned them. The manuscript vanished, and with it, an entire section of Mormon scripture that was never retranslated. The loss became one of the most consequential accidents in American religious history.

Who Harris Was and Why He Had Access

Martin Harris was not a casual believer. He was a prosperous farmer in Palmyra, New York, in his mid-50s when he met Joseph Smith around 1827. Harris became one of Smith's earliest financial backers and scribes—he literally wrote down the words as Smith dictated the translation of the golden plates. Harris was intelligent, literate, and wealthy enough to be useful, but he was also skeptical by nature. He wanted proof, not just faith. This tension between his financial support and his lingering doubt is crucial to understanding what happened next.

The Request and the Loss

By early 1828, Harris had transcribed roughly the first 116 pages of the manuscript. He asked Smith for permission to take the pages home to show his wife Lucy, hoping to win her over to the faith. Smith initially refused, but Harris persisted. According to Smith's later account, he prayed and received divine permission to let Harris borrow them—with strict conditions: Harris could show them only to his wife, his brother, his sister, and his parents. No one else.

Harris took the pages. His wife Lucy, who remained skeptical of Smith's work throughout her life, apparently never returned them. Whether she lost them, destroyed them deliberately, or they were misplaced in the Harris household remains unknown. Harris searched frantically but could not recover them. The manuscript was gone.

Smith's Interpretation: Divine Punishment

Joseph Smith did not treat this as a simple accident. He interpreted the loss as direct divine punishment—not for Harris's carelessness, but for his pride and greed. Smith believed Harris had wanted to show off the manuscript to gain credit and admiration, and that he had doubted the work despite his involvement in it. In Smith's theology, God had allowed the loss to humble Harris and test his faith. Smith himself stopped translating for several months, claiming he had lost the spiritual gift to continue. The loss became a moral lesson embedded in early Mormon doctrine.

Why This Mattered: The Book of Lehi and the Translation Problem

The 116 pages contained what Smith called the Book of Lehi—an entire section of the narrative that was never retranslated. Smith refused to simply retranslate the same material, arguing that if he did, critics could claim he had fabricated a second version that differed from the first (which would prove fraud). Instead, he skipped forward in the plates to a different section and continued from there. The result: the Book of Mormon as published in 1830 contains a permanent gap where the Book of Lehi should be. Readers encounter Lehi's story only indirectly, through references in later books.

This decision had lasting theological and textual consequences. It created an asymmetry in the Mormon canon—a missing piece that believers had to accept as part of God's plan. It also gave critics an easy target: the lost pages became evidence of either Smith's unreliability or the implausibility of the whole enterprise.

What Happened to Harris After

Martin Harris did not abandon the faith after the loss, though it tested him severely. He remained a believer and a scribe, and he eventually became one of the Three Witnesses who signed a formal statement testifying that they had seen the golden plates with their own eyes (published in the front of the Book of Mormon). Harris's willingness to persist despite the disaster—and to stake his reputation on a public testimony—became part of his legacy in Mormon history. He lived until 1875, long enough to see the religion grow into a major movement. Yet the loss of the 116 pages remained the defining moment of his early involvement with Smith.

Why This Moment Matters

The lost 116 pages were far more than a clerical mishap. They exposed fundamental questions about the nature of Smith's prophetic authority: If God was guiding the translation, why would He allow the manuscript to be lost? If the loss was punishment, what did that say about the reliability of revelation? For believers, the incident became a test of faith—a moment when doubt had to be overcome. For skeptics, it was evidence of fraud or delusion. The loss also forced Smith to develop a new theological explanation for why retranslation was impossible, which in turn shaped how Mormons understood the permanence and finality of revelation.

The 116 pages also matter because they were never recovered, which means no independent verification of their contents is possible. Scholars and critics cannot compare what Smith originally wrote to what he claimed was on the plates. This absence has fueled centuries of debate about the Book of Mormon's authenticity and origins.

The Core Facts
  • Martin Harris borrowed 116 pages of manuscript in 1828; they were lost and never recovered.
  • The pages contained the Book of Lehi, which was never retranslated.
  • Joseph Smith interpreted the loss as divine punishment for Harris's pride and doubt.
  • The incident created a permanent gap in the Book of Mormon and became a defining test of early Mormon faith.
Could the 116 pages still be found somewhere?
Extremely unlikely. Scholars and collectors have searched for nearly 200 years with no credible evidence of their existence. If they survived, they would be among the most valuable religious documents in American history. The most plausible explanations remain loss, destruction, or accidental disposal by the Harris family.
Did Joseph Smith ever explain why God would allow the loss?
Yes. Smith taught that the loss was a test of faith and a punishment for Harris's pride and doubt. He also developed a theological argument that retranslating the same material would be impossible without creating a fraudulent second version. This reasoning became part of Mormon doctrine on revelation.
How does the missing Book of Lehi affect the Book of Mormon as it exists today?
Readers encounter Lehi's teachings only indirectly, through references in later books like 1 Nephi. The narrative flow is disrupted, and some theological content is lost. This gap is one of the most cited textual problems in Mormon scripture.
Did Martin Harris regret lending the pages?
There is no direct evidence that Harris expressed deep regret in surviving records. What we know is that he persisted in his faith and became a public witness to the Book of Mormon. However, the loss clearly affected him, and it became the defining moment of his early relationship with Smith.
Why didn't Joseph Smith just retranslate the 116 pages anyway?
Smith explicitly refused, arguing that if he retranslated and the new version differed from the original (which it inevitably would), critics could use the discrepancy to prove he was a fraud. By skipping ahead instead, he avoided that trap—but at the cost of leaving a permanent gap in the text.

Sources