Papalocal
Loading…
Papalocal Your local communities & everything app — businesses, deals, library, and more.

Women's Spiritual Experiences and Healing Practices in Nineteenth-Century Latter-day Saint Communities

How Latter-day Saint women in the 1800s developed their own spiritual authority through healing, prophecy, and religious practice.

By Garret Merkley · Explainer · Aug 17, 2026
Branched from The Role of Women's Voices in Early Latter-day Saint History
Quick take
  • LDS women in the 1800s practiced faith healing and midwifery as legitimate spiritual work, not subordinate to male clergy.
  • Women prophesied, testified, and led religious gatherings in ways that gave them real authority within their communities.
  • These practices were rooted in LDS theology about divine gifts and the Holy Ghost, which didn't distinguish by gender.
  • Nineteenth-century women's spiritual roles were gradually formalized or restricted as the church institutionalized in the late 1800s.

In nineteenth-century Latter-day Saint communities, women claimed and exercised spiritual authority through healing, prophecy, and religious practice in ways that were theologically sanctioned and socially recognized. These weren't informal or marginal activities—they were understood as direct expressions of divine power, rooted in LDS doctrine about spiritual gifts given to all believers regardless of gender. Women anointed the sick with oil, delivered prophecies in meetings, led prayer circles, and served as midwives with explicit spiritual dimensions to their work. This gave them a form of religious authority that operated somewhat independently of the male priesthood hierarchy.

Healing as Spiritual Practice

LDS women performed faith healing as a recognized spiritual gift. They anointed the sick with consecrated oil, laid on hands, and offered prayers for recovery. Unlike male priesthood holders, women typically did not perform the formal blessing that concluded the ritual—but the anointing itself was their domain and was understood as a direct channel of divine power. Women healers often worked in domestic settings: at bedsides during childbirth, in homes during epidemics, and in community spaces during illness. Midwifery was particularly important, as LDS women midwives combined practical obstetric knowledge with spiritual practice, invoking divine protection and healing for mother and child. These roles gave women recognized expertise and spiritual standing in their communities.

Prophecy and Religious Authority

Early LDS theology held that the Holy Ghost could speak through any believer, male or female. In practice, women prophesied in religious meetings, testified to spiritual experiences, and offered guidance framed as divine communication. Women described visions, received revelations about community welfare, and warned of spiritual dangers. These utterances were recorded in diaries and letters, and often shaped how families and groups understood divine will. Women's prophetic voices were not always challenged or subordinated in the moment—they were part of the texture of religious life. Some women, like Eliza R. Snow and others, became known for their spiritual insight and were consulted on important matters. This prophetic authority existed alongside and sometimes independent of formal priesthood structures.

Theological Grounding and Social Practice

These practices were not aberrations or subversions of LDS doctrine—they were consistent with foundational teachings. Joseph Smith taught that spiritual gifts were distributed by the Holy Ghost without regard to gender or office. The LDS concept of the priesthood, while male-held in formal terms, coexisted with a broader theology of spiritual gifts available to all. Women's healing and prophecy fit within this framework. Additionally, LDS communities in the 1800s were often geographically isolated, facing health crises, food shortages, and existential threats. In these conditions, women's spiritual practices were not luxuries but necessities. A woman's ability to heal or prophesy was as practically important as her ability to farm or cook. This gave her spiritual work genuine social weight.

Formalization and Restriction

As the LDS Church institutionalized in the late 1800s—particularly after settling in Utah and establishing formal hierarchies—women's spiritual practices became more regulated. The church created official structures like the Female Relief Society, which channeled women's charitable and spiritual work into organized, supervised channels. Healing practices became more formalized and sometimes restricted. Women's prophetic utterances, once common in meetings, were increasingly scrutinized and limited to specific contexts. By the early 1900s, women's spiritual authority had become more bounded and mediated through male leadership. This was not a sudden reversal but a gradual shift from distributed, informal spiritual practice toward centralized institutional control. The shift reflected broader patterns of professionalization and bureaucratization in American religious life.

Why This Matters

Understanding women's spiritual practices in early LDS communities reveals that gender and religious authority were more complex and negotiable in the nineteenth century than later institutional structures suggest. It shows that women found ways to exercise genuine spiritual power within a male-led church, and that these roles were theologically defensible and socially recognized. It also demonstrates how institutionalization—while bringing stability and resources—can narrow the spaces where women hold recognized authority. For historians, this period illuminates how women's religious lives operated on their own terms, not merely as support for male leadership. For contemporary readers, it raises questions about how spiritual authority is distributed, who gets to heal and prophesy, and how institutional growth affects the roles available to different groups.

Key Contexts
  • Most of these practices occurred in the 1830s–1880s, before formal institutional restrictions took hold.
  • Frontier and settlement conditions made women's practical and spiritual skills essential to community survival.
  • LDS theology about spiritual gifts provided theological permission for women's practices, even if formal priesthood was male-only.
  • Written records (diaries, letters, meeting minutes) document these practices, though they were often underemphasized in official church histories.
Did LDS women actually perform healings, or is this romanticized?
Women did perform healing rituals documented in diaries, letters, and community records. Whether they were 'effective' in a medical sense is a different question—but their spiritual authority to perform them was recognized by their communities. Many women combined folk remedies, midwifery knowledge, and prayer in ways that were understood as spiritually and practically legitimate.
Didn't the LDS priesthood restrict women from spiritual authority?
The LDS priesthood was male-only, but LDS theology also taught that spiritual gifts (including healing and prophecy) were given by the Holy Ghost to all believers. In practice, women's gifts were recognized and exercised, though not always formalized. The tension between priesthood structure and spiritual gift theology allowed women real space for spiritual practice, even if it was not officially called 'priesthood.'
What happened to women's healing and prophetic roles after the 1800s?
As the LDS Church institutionalized, these roles became more supervised and restricted. The Relief Society formalized women's charitable work, and prophetic utterances were increasingly scrutinized. By the early 1900s, women's spiritual authority was more tightly bounded, though healing prayers and testimonies continued in private and family settings.
Are there sources that document these practices?
Yes. Women's diaries, letters, and Relief Society minutes record healing practices, prophecies, and spiritual experiences. Academic historians like Jill Mulvay Derr and others have analyzed these sources. The LDS Church's own archives contain testimonies and accounts, though some were not emphasized in official histories until recent scholarship.
Did men's priesthood authority conflict with women's healing practices?
Not always, and not formally. In many cases, women anointed the sick and men completed the blessing—a collaborative model. Conflict arose more when women's prophecies or spiritual claims seemed to challenge male leadership, or when institutional growth required clearer hierarchies. The tension was real but often negotiated rather than openly contested.

Sources