Papalocal
Loading…
← All news
Politics

Trump DOJ Appointees Seek Exits as Midterm Losses and Miller Promotion Shake Department

A wave of Justice Department political appointees is quietly seeking private-sector jobs, fearing that their ties to a rejected Trump agenda and incoming Democratic oversight will damage their careers and bar licenses.

How does this story make you feel?

In the week since Democrats dominated the midterms, a quiet scramble has broken out inside the Justice Department: political appointees are texting former colleagues for job leads, weighing whether to buy professional liability insurance, and in some cases drafting resignation plans — all driven by the fear that their careers could be permanently marked by their association with a Trump agenda voters rejected.

According to Bloomberg Law, which spoke with current and former Trump DOJ officials, the flurry of private-sector outreach has intensified in the past week. A former department leader now working outside government said that in just the past few days, about five DOJ political appointees had reached out by text seeking guidance on their careers. Outreach of a similar kind was described by several other department veterans who served in one or both Trump administrations.

The mood at department headquarters is described as grim. Attorney General Todd Blanche and those closest to him are girding for intense congressional scrutiny as newly empowered House and Senate leaders move to examine department actions in which political appointees played a central role. The prospect of Democratic lawmakers receiving whistleblower complaints from career employees — complaints tied to mandates these same appointees issued — is a specific source of anxiety, according to current and former officials.

There are people who realized things have fundamentally changed in the country, and if that's the direction the president wants to go, they're not as aligned anymore — partly because that's not the direction America is going and also because they need to work.— Former Trump DOJ official, describing discussions with multiple current appointees

Four Senate-confirmed DOJ officials have already departed since the midterms. Brett Shumate, who led the Civil Division, resigned Monday. Legislative affairs chief Patrick Davis left last month. Both departures were voluntary, according to Bloomberg Law. The administration showed others the door, among them national security head John Eisenberg, because it was unhappy with how they performed.

President Trump's promotion of Stephen Miller to White House chief of staff has added a distinct layer of alarm. Some DOJ aides were already frustrated fielding Miller's dictates; his elevation has prompted new rounds of calls to private-sector contacts. According to Bloomberg Law, even officials who agree with Miller on policy are considering leaving, driven by the expectation that his involvement in daily operations will make their jobs progressively harder to bear.

Blanche, at a press conference Monday, pushed back on the narrative. He said, 'There's nothing unusual about folks leaving the Department of Justice this week or next week or a few weeks ago.' Department spokesperson Kiersten Pels took issue with the Bloomberg Law report, calling it anonymously sourced 'click-bait' and countering that 'the vast majority of political appointees at the Department are proud to work here,' while pointing to a 'record number of prosecutions' and lower crime rates.

Inside the department, the remaining staff appear to have split into two distinct camps, according to current and former officials. One group — largely younger, MAGA-aligned lawyers drawn from conservative think tanks or Republican state attorneys general offices — is embracing the coming oversight fights and, in some cases, angling for promotions to acting leadership roles as vacancies multiply. Some in this group, however, are also quietly considering purchasing professional liability insurance, aware that their bar licenses could be at risk depending on what they are ordered to do or what surfaces during congressional hearings.

The second camp includes more traditional conservatives and lawyers who aspire to return to large law firms or move into in-house corporate roles. Some were pushed toward the exit by the election results themselves; others were prompted by watching their bosses resign in rapid succession over the past week. Still others in this group are aligned with the administration's goals but are plotting departures simply because they expect their jobs to become miserable once Democrats control Congress.

The absence of Senate-confirmed leaders along with the loss of many experienced career lawyers creates a very challenging environment, particularly given the inevitable oversight disputes. It might not be possible to keep up with the heavy workloads, and they're going to make mistakes.— Rod Rosenstein, deputy attorney general in Trump's first term

The department's hiring pipeline is also showing strain. Bloomberg Law reported that, according to a person familiar with internal department dynamics, some people who had recently accepted positions withdrew those acceptances after the midterms. The deputy attorney general's office has not yet issued new enforcement memos to field offices. On Monday, principal associate DAG Aakash Singh directed all U.S. attorneys to prepare for a more intense period ahead, according to two individuals briefed on the meeting.

At U.S. attorneys' offices around the country — typically more insulated from Washington's political swings — leaders are readying themselves to carry forward the approach they took during Trump's first two years in office, Bloomberg Law reported.

Why it matters — A hollowing-out of experienced DOJ leadership — through forced exits, voluntary resignations, and a drying hiring pipeline — leaves the department less equipped to handle both its existing caseload and the congressional oversight battles now on the horizon.

⚠ Not yet confirmed

  • Some DOJ political appointees are actively drafting resignation letters or have set departure timelines.
  • Harmeet Dhillon's departure from the Civil Rights Division is included among the post-midterm exits.
  • Specific unsupported claim that Politico reported departures of Harmeet Dhillon and Jason Reding Quiñones

Sources differ on Whether the current DOJ departures are unusual or alarming: Departures reflect a grim mood and career fears unique to this moment, accelerated by the midterms and Miller's promotion (news.bloomberglaw.com (anonymous current and former officials)) vs 'There's nothing unusual about folks leaving the Department of Justice this week or next week or a few weeks ago' (news.bloomberglaw.com (AG Todd Blanche))

Reported by bloomberglaw.com, news.bloomberglaw.com, politico.com, newsminimalist.com

Community

Be the first to comment.

Share this story
Text Email